Putin’s Military LATEST TECHNOLOGY showcased in show


The military, also called the armed forces, are forces authorized to use deadly force, and weapons, to support the interests of the state and some or all of its citizens. The task of the military is usually defined as defense of the state and its citizens, and the prosecution of war against another state. The military may also have additional sanctioned and non-sanctioned functions within a society, including, the promotion of a political agenda, protecting corporate economic interests, internal population control, construction, emergency services, social ceremonies, and guarding important areas. The military can also function as a discrete subculture within a larger civil society, through the development of separate infrastructures, which may include housing, schools, utilities, food production and banking.

The profession of soldiering as part of a military is older than recorded history itself. Some of the most enduring images of the classical antiquity portray the power and feats of its military leaders. The Battle of Kadesh in 1274 BC was one of the defining points of Pharaoh Ramesses II’s reign and is celebrated in bas-relief on his monuments. A thousand years later the first emperor of unified China, Qin Shi Huang, was so determined to impress the gods with his military might that he was buried with an army of terracotta soldiers.[1] The Romans were dedicated to military matters, leaving to posterity many treatises and writings as well as a large number of lavishly carved triumphal arches and victory columns.

Etymology and definitions[edit]
Issue: Possibly cognate with Thousand, cf. Latin and Romance language root word “mil-“)
The first recorded use of the word military in English, spelled militarie, was in 1585.[2] It comes from the Latin militaris (from Latin miles meaning “soldier”) but is of uncertain etymology, one suggestion being derived from *mil-it- – going in a body or mass.[3][4] The word is now identified as denoting someone that is skilled in use of weapons, or engaged in military service or in warfare.[5][6]

Soldiers from the Canadian Grenadier Guards in the Kandahar Province of Afghanistan
As a noun the military usually refers generally to a country’s armed forces or sometimes, more specifically, to the senior officers who command them.[5][6] In general it refers to the physicality of armed forces, their personnel, equipment, and physical area which they occupy.

As an adjective military originally referred only to soldiers and soldiering, but it soon broadened to apply to land forces in general and anything to do with their profession.[2] The names of both the Royal Military Academy (1741) and United States Military Academy (1802) reflect this. However, at about the time of the Napoleonic Wars, “military” began to be used in reference to armed forces as a whole[2] and in the 21st century expressions like “military service”, “military intelligence” and “military history” encompass naval, marine and air force aspects. As such, it now connotes any activity performed by armed force personnel.

History
Military history is often considered to be the history of all conflicts, not just the history of the state militaries. It differs somewhat from the history of war with military history focusing on the people and institutions of war-making while the history of war focuses on the evolution of war itself in the face of changing technology, governments, and geography.

Military history has a number of purposes. One main purpose is to learn from past accomplishments and mistakes so as to more effectively wage war in the future. Another is to create a sense of military tradition which is used to create cohesive military forces. Still another may be to learn to prevent wars more effectively. Human knowledge about the military is largely based on both recorded and oral history of military conflicts (war), their participating armies and navies and, more recently, air forces.

There are two types of military history, although almost all texts have elements of both: descriptive history that serves to chronicle conflicts without offering any statements about the causes, nature of conduct, the ending and effects of a conflict; and analytical history that seeks to offer statements about the causes, nature, ending and aftermath of conflicts as a means of deriving knowledge and understanding of conflicts as a whole, and prevent repetition of mistakes in future, to suggest better concepts or methods in employing forces, or to advocate the need for new technology.

source


Originally posted 2017-06-10 09:01:40. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Jinger Jarrett

Jinger Jarrett is a full time freelance writer, author and internet marketer who teaches small businesses how to get started online and then market their businesses for free. She is also a US Army Veteran and seeks to connect with other veterans who are interested in starting a business or are currently business owners and want to connect.

47 thoughts on “Putin’s Military LATEST TECHNOLOGY showcased in show

  • June 8, 2017 at 8:08 am
    Permalink

    Noob countries like these need to be wiped off the earth before they do you,serously hows does anyone gain from this foward march to world war lol presidents to are to dumb to see this but by why is the world so dumb to see this?

    Reply
  • June 8, 2017 at 8:08 am
    Permalink

    all this makes me want to vomit and makes me ashamed im human, lets hope the aliens zaps it all into useless crap asap!

    Reply
  • June 8, 2017 at 8:08 am
    Permalink

    это реклама что ли не люблю человекоубийство или это щезефрения у кого либо

    Reply
  • June 8, 2017 at 8:08 am
    Permalink

    I don't understand the names with Putin, and then Putin? It is the job of the MIC (military industrial complex) Putin is the President he does not control the military industrial complex. The idiotic names.

    Reply
  • June 8, 2017 at 8:08 am
    Permalink

    Long live Russia! Russia only defends oneself from aggressive countries – USA and Great Britain and their block of NATO, that under the guise of """democracy and human rights"" carry to other people – war, intervention, putsches and colonial captures. American and British propaganda often much tells about Russia and Putin!

    Reply
  • June 8, 2017 at 8:08 am
    Permalink

    the problem with Russia is the use of technology to suppress people us and UK use technology to defend themselves

    Reply
  • June 8, 2017 at 8:08 am
    Permalink

    There's more innovation and technology in this one event than the US has have had in ten decades of gun shows and military expos.

    Reply
  • June 8, 2017 at 8:08 am
    Permalink

    Top Notch, have you ever served in the US Military? Well I have for 26 years. I've seen what our military has and what other countries military has, even China. There is no country in the world that can match us. So unless you've seen up close, then keep your mouth shut.

    Reply
  • June 8, 2017 at 8:08 am
    Permalink

    I like how people hate America because they say we support terrorist but most if not a

    Reply
  • June 8, 2017 at 8:08 am
    Permalink

    How do you know it's a good Russian weapons video?
    Great Russian weapons – CHECK!
    Butthurt Yank comments – CHECK!

    Reply
  • June 8, 2017 at 8:08 am
    Permalink

    what i got FROM this vídeo. dont fuck with us stupid americans or we will nuke you all the way back to hell!!

    Reply
  • June 8, 2017 at 8:08 am
    Permalink

    Awesome, I wish us did the for its people, but no federal government will probley never do that for us

    Reply
  • June 8, 2017 at 8:08 am
    Permalink

    aku bangga dan suka dengan rusia, , , ,
    maju terus rusia, , , salam dari pemuda indonesia

    Reply
  • June 8, 2017 at 8:08 am
    Permalink

    Russians and their cheap technology selling it on to all their terrorist friends. America should drop a nuke on this whole event

    Reply
  • June 8, 2017 at 8:08 am
    Permalink

    Russian or American exercises, does anybody notice that very few of the shots taken actually hit the targets perfectly?

    Reply
  • June 8, 2017 at 8:08 am
    Permalink

    I'm tired of people arguing about Superpowers, everywhere are misleading political leaders doing things for their own intrests when if the world could just unite and all the great scientific minds could revolutionize the human race. And for the moment I wouldn't underestimate Russia because they have some very strong allies as well that could equally do as well as NATO.

    Reply
  • June 8, 2017 at 8:08 am
    Permalink

    all the idiots bashing this machine its a one of a kind amazing armored vehicle, read about it, t-72 "terminator" if you read the facts on it its an insane piece of equipment, the west has nothing like this , and the Russian government isn't even buying it anyway you idiots its made for export, for China, India, and Kazakhstan, Russia is waiting for the armata IFV which they already have prototypes of

    Reply

Leave a Reply